Commentary from the most important and leading critics of the science of Cartoonology:
What sort of buffoon would fall into his book?
Oh be nice! Anyone could get a little sleepy when reading "A history of Actuarial Loss Models"
Anyone who lacks the discipline of a rigorous Actuarial man! What are you? A pansy theoretician? Do you need a few spectral sequences to get you going? Why my grand-daddy cut his teeth writing out table after table of actuarial data!
Boring!
